<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>theSalmonFarm Blog &#187; News Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/category/news-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog</link>
	<description>Bloggin' down on the Farm - news and happenings from the Salmon Farm. A blog on various topics including my thoughts on collaborative technology, personal information in the 21st century, the global internet (or the lack there of), dog training, cooking, architecture, and whatever happens to be a pet peeve on any given day !</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The irony of advertising</title>
		<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/31/the-irony-of-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/31/the-irony-of-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lotus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/31/the-irony-of-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I&#8217;ve been told that in the broadcast media, there are contract clauses that stipulate what ads can run side by side. For instance, if you are Honda, you probably don&#8217;t want the TV network running a Toyota Prius ad right next to your Civic Hybrid spot.
I&#8217;m guessing the same rules do not apply to web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--Mime Type of File is image/png --></p>
<div class="postie-image-div"><a href="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/wp-content/postie-photos/20080731-054120-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignright postie-image" style="float: right;" src="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/wp-content/postie-photos/thumb.20080731-054120-1.jpg" alt="ScreenShot063.png" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve been told that in the broadcast media, there are contract clauses that stipulate what ads can run side by side. For instance, if you are Honda, you probably don&#8217;t want the TV network running a Toyota Prius ad right next to your Civic Hybrid spot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the same rules do not apply to web advertising. I don&#8217;t think it was coincidence that sitting right next to the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072208-ibm-lotus.html?hpg1=bn" target="_blank">article</a> about IBM/Lotus Sametime telephony integration was a video ad spot for Microsoft VoIP. Something tells me the marketing guys are both sides will get an earful - The blue team may want to call in sick while the red team is probably getting high-fives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/31/the-irony-of-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo retouching in the media</title>
		<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/14/photo-retouching-in-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/14/photo-retouching-in-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/14/photo-retouching-in-the-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been debating a question of photo retouching as it relates to factual reporting in the news. Clearly, &#8220;adding and removing important content&#8221; risks distorting the information conveyed by a photograph. What about retouching such as removing blemishes, correcting color, or altering the lighting / contrast / or levels ?
What brought this to the forefront [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been debating a question of photo retouching as it relates to factual reporting in the news. Clearly, &#8220;adding and removing important content&#8221; risks distorting the information conveyed by a photograph. What about retouching such as removing blemishes, correcting color, or altering the lighting / contrast / or levels ?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">What brought this to the forefront for me was my post about the Lunar Moth. The event was real. The moth was spread out flat on the grass. I did various cleanup procedures on the image and changed the lighting to better present the moth. Here is the before and after. You get to decide if it was to maintain the photograph&#8217;s presentation of fact.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/wp-content/postie-photos/20080714-085625-1.jpg" alt="" width="530" height="342" /><br />
<img src="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/wp-content/postie-photos/20080714-085628-2.jpg" alt="" width="532" height="344" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The image was straitened, color corrected, sharpened (perhaps a bit too much), and a faint darkening of the grass under the moth to make it stand out. The most dramatic &#8220;touch up&#8221; was to repair to all the damage of the wings. It is this last element - in my opinion - that makes this less factual and more &#8220;art&#8221;. If it were scratches in an old photo, that would be artificial damage and the repairs would be more warranted. In this case, it represents a natural occurrence which the camera captured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/14/photo-retouching-in-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching the evening news in the morning</title>
		<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/07/watching-the-evening-news-in-the-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/07/watching-the-evening-news-in-the-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/07/watching-the-evening-news-in-the-morning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 I still don&#8217;t have TV service and I plan to keep it that way for a while longer. One thing I have missed is the evening national news. I found the NBC Evening News has been made available as a podcast. That&#8217;s good, but I don&#8217;t like to leave my computers running at night [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
 <img alt="" src="http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/wp-content/postie-photos/20080707-052740-1.jpg" align="right"  height="58" width="353">I still don&#8217;t have TV service and I plan to keep it that way for a while longer. One thing I have missed is the evening national news. I found the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/" target="_blank">NBC Evening News</a> has been made available as a podcast. That&#8217;s good, but I don&#8217;t like to leave my computers running at night so I&#8217;ve been left with watching for the update to appear in my feed reader (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_reader" target="_blank">Google Reader</a>) and then manually starting the download. The only &#8220;computer&#8221; that runs at night is my <a href="http://www.netgear.com/Products/Storage/ReadyNASNVPlus.aspx" target="_blank">ReadyNAS</a> which is performing backups and retrieving Linux builds etc. via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent" target="_blank">BitTorrent</a>.</p>
<p> I discovered that the <a href="http://podcast.msnbc.com/audio/podcast/MSNBC-NN-NETCAST-M4V.xml" target="_blank">video podcast</a> is also available as a simple <a href="http://msnbcpod.rd.llnwd.net/e1/video/podcast/pdv_nn_netcast_m4v.m4v" target="_blank">video download</a>. The big difference is that the podcast assigns a unique file name to each day&#8217;s news whereas the video download has the same name all of the time. This gave me an idea. The ReadyNAS does not have a podcast client but it does have a lightweight version of Linux. I did some digging and found that it runs <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron#Modern_versions" target="_blank">cron</a>, as task scheduler. So, I setup to define a &#8220;task&#8221; that would download the evening news every night. It turned out to be simple one-line command &#8230;<br /> <br />
<blockquote>wget -t 5 -nc -o /media/Daily/nbc-nightly-news.log <br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -O /media/Daily/nbc-nightly-news.m4v&nbsp; <br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://msnbcpod.rd.llnwd.net/e1/video/podcast/pdv_nn_netcast_m4v.m4v">http://msnbcpod.rd.llnwd.net/e1/video/podcast/pdv_nn_netcast_m4v.m4v</a><br />   <i><small>Note: &#8220;/media/Daily&#8221; is the directory accessable to my video player.</small></i> </p></blockquote>
<p> Now, at one minute past one in the morning (&#8221;1 1 * * *&#8221; in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron#crontab_syntax" target="_blank">crontab</a> syntax) the ReadyNAS fetches the evening news. I get up every morning, and watch the evening news while enjoying my morning espresso. It&#8217;s not a bad way to start the day !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2008/07/07/watching-the-evening-news-in-the-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://msnbcpod.rd.llnwd.net/e1/video/podcast/pdv_nn_netcast_m4v.m4v" length="121404983" type="video/m4v" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best news on the web - BBC.com</title>
		<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/08/10/best-news-on-the-web-bbccom/</link>
		<comments>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/08/10/best-news-on-the-web-bbccom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/08/10/best-news-on-the-web-bbccom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In an unofficial poll, BBC NEWS has come out on top for the &#8220;most useful Internet news site&#8221;. Using a set of criteria including layout, currency of content, easy of access, headlines and details, and the subjective &#8220;I felt&#160;up to date&#8221;, the top news organizations&#8217; websites were reviewed. The process included CNN, MSNBC, NBC, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42001000/gif/_42001036_bbc_logo_2.gif" align="left"> In an unofficial poll, BBC NEWS has come out on top for the &#8220;most useful Internet news site&#8221;. Using a set of criteria including layout, currency of content, easy of access, headlines and details, and the subjective &#8220;I felt&nbsp;up to date&#8221;, the top news organizations&#8217; websites were reviewed. The process included CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, AP, BBC, USA TODAY, and FOX NEWS. (For those wondering, news aggregators were not included in the survey but were in an informational questionnaire.)</p>
<p>What is interesting is the poll was of readers from the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/08/10/best-news-on-the-web-bbccom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy, the 21st Century Myth - &#34;you will be found&#34;</title>
		<link>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/04/19/privacy-the-21st-century-myth-you-will-be-found/</link>
		<comments>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/04/19/privacy-the-21st-century-myth-you-will-be-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MySpace.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/04/19/privacy-the-21st-century-myth-you-will-be-found/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A news story on NRP&#8217;s &#8220;All Things Considered&#8221; this evening, had an interesting subtext. The initial context of the news story highlighted that students at Virginia Tech have been using Facebook and MySpace as a means of communicating with each other and with distant friends. The subtext was how the news media has used this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A news story on NRP&#8217;s &#8220;All Things Considered&#8221; this evening, had an interesting subtext. The initial context of the news story highlighted that students at Virginia Tech have been using <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.myspace.com/">MySpace</a> as a means of communicating with each other and with distant friends. The subtext was how the news media has used this same content for dual purposes - both as news content and as potential news *contacts*.</p>
<p>(I preface the next paragraph by saying I wrote it before&nbsp;I took the time to read Facebook&#8217;s terms of use.)</p>
<p>News outlets have used these public Internet sites to harvest background content, quotes, and story lines. To a greater or lesser extent, this is reasonable or reasonably expected. The&nbsp;content in the public domain. </p>
<p>More interesting (and unfortunate) is that media personnel have used the information from Facebook and MySpace to identify potential interviewees for the purpose of securing quotes from students involved as well as friends and family of students effected. In some cases, the media were insistent in their pursuits - to the point of harassment.</p>
<p>I was not familiar with the policies at Facebook so I took a closer look. It turns out, the media&#8217;s behavior could be found in violation of the terms of the service.</p>
<blockquote><p>You further agree not to harvest or collect email addresses or other contact information of Users from the Service or the Site by electronic or other means for the purposes of sending unsolicited emails or other unsolicited communications.</p>
<p>Source <a href="http://www.facebook.com/terms.php">Facebook Terms of Use</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>To be honest, I was not expecting the above section of the terms of use. I had assumed the user content would be deemed &#8220;in the public domain&#8221;. It&#8217;s refreshing - but the pessimist in me suspects it goes mostly ignored.</p>
<p>What all of this means is that &#8220;if it&#8217;s in the Internet, it&#8217;s considered fair game&#8221;. It means those who choose to publish in the Internet, should&nbsp;evaluate all the good and bad ways that information may be used. It is our responsibility to protect ourselves, our family, and our friends.</p>
<p>This is an unfortunate state of affairs. However, it is reality. If someone wants to misuse or subvert a situation, there are too many possible ways for us to prevent them all. Information and privacy are the latest victims.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thesalmonfarm.org/blog/2007/04/19/privacy-the-21st-century-myth-you-will-be-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
